Main »  About rating »  Rating scales »  Corporate Governance Rating Scale

Corporate Governance Rating Scale

Corporate Governance Rating Scale

Rating

Definition

uaАcg

Corporate governance is characterized by the highest level. The risks concerned with the corporate governance under the national market conditions are minimal. The interests of owners and other interested parties are met in full.

uaВcg

Corporate governance is characterized by a high level. The risks concerned with the corporate governance under the national market conditions are insignificant. The interests of owners and/or other interested parties can not be met in full.

uaСcg

Corporate governance is characterized by a medium level. The risks concerned with the corporate governance under the national market conditions are sufficient. The interests of owners and/or other interested parties are not met in full.

uaDcg

Corporate governance is characterized by a low level. The risks concerned with the corporate governance under the national market conditions are high. The interests of owners and/or other interested parties are violated.

uaЕcg

Corporate governance is characterized by the lowest level. The risks concerned with the corporate governance under the national market conditions are very high. The interests of owners and/or other interested parties are mainly not met.

 

Credit Rating Outlooks

Stable 

A Stable outlook indicates that there are no anticipated reasons to change the rating in the course of the year

Positive 

A Positive outlook indicates that there is a possibility to upgrade the rating in the course of the year, on the condition that positive trends are maintained and that current risks are reduced.

Negative 

A Negative outlook indicates that there is a possibility to downgrade the rating in the course of the year, on the condition that negative trends are maintained and that current risks occur.

Developing 

A Developing outlook indicates that there is a high possibility for a rating to be changed in the course of the year.

source: «КР Монитор», 4 (4)